We’re feeling the octopus hug of algorithms: warm, convenient… and kinda tight. Hyper-personalization saves time, but it can totally stunt curiosity. The result? Predictable feeds, anemic imagination, and privacy on permanent vacation.
3 ideas that don’t fit in a carousel (but I’m gonna squeeze them in anyway):
-
Personalization ≠ plurality. Models optimize for similarity, not surprise — great for clicks, terrible for creativity.
-
Privacy is a creative prerequisite. Without “off-feed zones,” no one risks the weird that becomes original.
-
Choice design matters. Buttons for “reset recommendations,” “creative anonymous mode,” and “random mix” are UX for autonomy, not just for fun.
Mini-framework S³ for creators and educators:
-
Serendipity: set aside 15% of the feed for off-standard content.
-
Safety: on-device, minimized data, ephemeral logs.
-
Stewardship: explain why something shows up; let the user take the wheel.
🎯 Mission-lab (20 min):
-
Turn off recommendations for 24 hours.
-
Manually search for 3 topics outside your bubble (e.g., astronomy, Japanese typography, agro-tech).
-
Jot down 1 new idea per topic and turn it into a micro-prototype (a sketch, an audio clip, a paragraph).
📊 Homemade metric: Serendipity Index (SI) = new ideas / sources explored. Boost that number weekly.
